<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The present and future of post production business and technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philiphodgetts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com</link>
	<description>Philip Hodgetts' random thoughts and items of interest on where the industry is at, and where it might be going today and into the future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Paramount&#8217;s new division for micro-budget films</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/paramounts-new-division-for-m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/paramounts-new-division-for-m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/paramounts-new-division-for-m/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paramount&#8217;s new division for micro-budget films: 10 films $100,000 each first year. http://bit.ly/dbL1ON
Do they have Paranormal Activity envy?
“Aren’t you tired of being fed the same movies wrapped in different paper?” asks the Insurge website, “We want to find and distribute crazy, unpredictable, and hopefully awesome movies &#8211; movies that make you want to line up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/paramounts-new-division-for-m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a google set top box the &#8220;wave of the future&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/is-a-google-set-top-box-the-w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/is-a-google-set-top-box-the-w/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/is-a-google-set-top-box-the-w/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is a google set top box the &#8220;wave of the future&#8221;? http://bit.ly/bqezPS Lots of opinions from fairly positive to &#8220;never going to happen&#8221;.
I&#8217;m biased as that type of index is exactly the vision we had for Open TV Network and Google faces the might of entrenched players, competing set-top boxes and very little reason for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/is-a-google-set-top-box-the-w/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futures trading for Film Profits?</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/futures-trading-for-film-profi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/futures-trading-for-film-profi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/futures-trading-for-film-profi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Futures trading for Film Profits http://bit.ly/bReQud This can&#8217;t end well. &#8220;Insider trading seems like it would be a non-trivial issue&#8221;
I think this is a very bad idea. The &#8216;wisdom of the crowds&#8217; is no more likely to get it right than the &#8220;experts&#8221; &#8211; and the example on predicting revenue for Alice in Wonderland proves [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/11/futures-trading-for-film-profi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest videos from Feb LAFCPUG</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/latest-videos-from-feb-lafcpug/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/latest-videos-from-feb-lafcpug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/latest-videos-from-feb-lafcpug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest videos from Feb LAFCPUG meeting now on Open TV Network. http://bit.ly/dnoEh5
Larry Jordan on &#8220;How to configure your (Final Cut Pro) system to minimize problems and Nesting. Best $1.49 you&#8217;ll spend this week.
Barry Goch provides an extensive (48 minutes for just $1.99) introduction to &#8220;Smoke on a Mac&#8221; &#8211; more than a product demo.
Andrew Balis [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/latest-videos-from-feb-lafcpug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OK Go leave EMI, form own label</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/ok-go-leave-emi-form-own-labl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/ok-go-leave-emi-form-own-labl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/ok-go-leave-emi-form-own-labl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK Go leave EMI, form own lable. http://bit.ly/aZ0uL1 EMI banned embedding for real viral campaign, tried fake viral. Band leaves. Profit.
Pop band OK Go are riding a wave of viral video success again with the amazing video of Here we go again but their last video flopped because their then label, EMI, refused to allow [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/ok-go-leave-emi-form-own-labl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why should Apple buy Adobe?</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/why-apple-should-buy-adobe-h/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/why-apple-should-buy-adobe-h/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/why-apple-should-buy-adobe-h/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Why Apple should buy Adobe&#8221; http://theappleblog.com/2010/03/09/why-apple-should-buy-adobe/
Simple answer, they shouldn&#8217;t!  Also that the writer thinks After Effects could be discarded makes their knowledge of video production pretty suspect, and therefore the rest of the article should be treated with suspicion.
But it&#8217;s an interesting thought. Apple could buy Adobe out of cash on hand. Adobe&#8217;s market capitalization [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/why-apple-should-buy-adobe-h/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kyte introduces broadcast quality live streaming</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/kyte-introduces-broadcast-qual/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/kyte-introduces-broadcast-qual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/kyte-introduces-broadcast-qual/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kyte introduces broadcast quality (SD) streaming in a backpack, not a truck! http://tcrn.ch/9GL5yJ
It&#8217;s hard to believe that a backpack kit with wireless links can do the same portability and live reporting flexibility as those news trucks I see driving around LA all the time, with their relatively clumsy microwave uplink tower.
Kyte&#8217;s partners in the backpack [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/kyte-introduces-broadcast-qual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>79c an hour for Desperate Housewives</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/79c-an-hour-for-desperate-hous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/79c-an-hour-for-desperate-hous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/79c-an-hour-for-desperate-hous/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[79c an hour for Desperate Houswives from advertising revenue. http://nyti.ms/aRhoU2
This is right at the high end of advertising revenue per viewer per show.  Most fall in the range of 25-65c per viewer per show, with a few very successful outliers at 70-80c per viewer per show.
And yet, through iTunes they want $1.99. Just let me [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/79c-an-hour-for-desperate-hous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Kirsner is giving away free copies of his &#8220;Fans, Friends and Followers&#8221; ebook</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/rt-scottkirsner-free-copies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/rt-scottkirsner-free-copies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/rt-scottkirsner-free-copies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RT @ScottKirsner:  free copies of the &#8220;Fans, Friends &#38; Followers&#8221; e-book for the duration of @SXSW: http://bit.ly/bs2k50 (spread the word?)
I&#8217;m working my way through this book but Scott is one person who has his finger on the pulse of independent distribution. The book is a summary of his thoughts and a series of interviews [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/rt-scottkirsner-free-copies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU parliament overwhelmingly rejects ACTA</title>
		<link>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/eu-partliament-overwhelmingly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/eu-partliament-overwhelmingly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Item of Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/eu-partliament-overwhelmingly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EU parliament overwhelmingly votes against insidious nasty ACTA http://bit.ly/9xbgbL Great result. US should follow quickly. Nasty stuff
ACTA is a trade agreement being negotiated in secret so that even American politicians can&#8217;t see it. But old media are heavily involved and basically attempting to rewrite international law to favor their dying business models. Bad news for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/03/10/eu-partliament-overwhelmingly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
