Adobe Prelude

14 replies on “Adobe Prelude”

Leave a Comment
  1. I hope they add the ability to merge second system sound to video clips. I’ve been hoping for an app like this. I like the idea of going into Premiere with “cleaned and prep’ed” footage.

        1. I think he meant merging in Prelude ahead of editing in Premiere.

  2. Good point Eric. I hope there could be some good cineform or DNxHD support for converting to intermediates as well.

    1. From the view I had from backstage, it seems like you can convert to intermediates in any codec/format installed on the system. I *think*. Erik, didn’t see anything related to second system sound but it was only a quick preview not a full demo. Also it’ll be version 1 so it may not be as fully featured as they plan it to be.

  3. Real tough to get info on Prelude – looks fascinating. Would you say it could compete against parts of CatDV? The logging part and XML IO seems to indicate that.

    I wonder if it can work with low-res proxies.

    I would not be sorry if someone created a better “pre-editor” than CatDV. Love ’em, but I’m tired of the instability and bugs.

    1. It’s more like Adobe Bridge for video than CatDV. There’s no library created, just a simple project. Prelude appears to work direct from source and only with source, although it can *generate* proxies to work in Premiere.

      I’d say it’s more adapted to being a simple pre-editor than CatDV because it’s designed specifically for that purpose and only that purpose. With CatDV that’s a side-benefit of a library/cataloging application.

  4. I guess we have to remind developers what editing really is:
    selection. arrangement, and pacing. That generally indicates one edit venue. I would not have assistants selecting for me. Ingest and logging is valid, and Prelude may be very useful at that stage, but it’s unlikely I’m going to ask them to string out selects before I view everything– because “you never can tell.”

    That’s just the way it is.

    1. Prelude is largely designed for large news or reality organizations, not so much for individual editors where it has no real place in a workflow

      1. Looking at this, whilst dealing with the usual 2k/24 hrs of assets destined for 2 main and 12 subsidiary edits in FCPX, got me thinking that this is what might enable the outsourcing of rough assemblies.

        Here’s an ingest tool that unifies and bulk-applies metadata over formats, preps proxies and edit ready masters, ensures every clip has its paws cleaned and shoes shined ready for a ‘Craft’ Edit. Is this the bit we want outsourced?

        Is the next step after Prelude – especially for event videographers – find and mark the nice stuff – the bit we want outsourced?

        I was a little skeptical of the outsourcing of editing, but now… I’m not sure…

  5. I’ve just seen a Prelude demo at NAB – it’s an app that doesn’t immediately make sense until you look at how larger tapeless media workflows are being dealt with. It’s not so much for the 6 hours of footage you want to edit yourself this afternoon, it’s more for the archive for 10.000 hours that come in from multiple sources that somebody needs to prepare for an editor to work with in the morning, usually of footage he’s not seen before.

    Adobe is addressing a job that didn’t exist 3 years ago, one that’s becoming more and more important though: the Media Manager who needs to make sure footage is available, ready to be edited and – very important – meta data tagged correctly.

    I can see this working for live logging situations too where you have loggers document several live events at the same time.

    Thanks for the quick feature breakdown!

Comments are closed.