I’m somewhat of a 3D skeptic, particularly when it comes to 3D Television in the home. Â I’m fairly comfortable with the cinema experience (although the darker images, awareness of the glasses framing the screen and directors throwing things at me all the time are negatives in my opinion), but I just don’t see how the 3D experience will work with the way we view Television.
In the current issue of DV Magazine, editor David Williams asks why anyone wouldn’t want 3D in the home. My response is that,Â with glasses, it fundamentally does not fit with the way we watch TV. We don’t just watch TV silently. If I wanted that I’d watch on my laptop, and work on email or Twitter or curating my photo library or something else.
Glasses, in fact, were the biggest obstacle. â€œYouâ€™re going to ask friends and family to spend $150-$200 on a pair of glasses?â€ Tom asked. The cost would be prohibitive if he wanted to invite friends over for a football game or a movie. The group was simply incredulous when I explained that glasses from one manufacturer wouldnâ€™t work with TVs from another. Third-party universal models are coming out, however; and Samsung has vaguely promised future interoperable models.
Reactions were the same at the World Cup screening. While I was watching, a family came up to look at the TV. I offered the boy, about 4, my pair of glasses. He tried them for about a second, then pulled them off. His dad, probably in his 40s, was about as enthusiastic. â€œI like the TV, but will probably never buy the glasses,â€ he said, adding, â€œOnly one percent of the programming is in 3D. And then you gotta buy the $500 player.â€ (Samsungâ€™s BD-C6900 actually lists for $400.)
My new German friends felt the same. â€œWe would pay a little more,â€ said Astrid, â€œbecause weâ€™re technology freaks.â€ But she felt the premium was too much today. â€œWe just bought our first flat screen in the fall,â€ she added,â€ saying it would be a while before they got another TV.
Tom, from the first group, may have summed up everyoneâ€™s opinion when he said â€œI could see buying this in maybe five years, when thereâ€™s more content and cheaper glassesâ€