Categories
Item of Interest

Using Scopes to measure video level

It’s always preferable to prove the accuracy of your video levels using external scopes as long as they’re downstream of your output hardware.

One common problem, as discussed in the BuZZ show of Jan 25, is the levels coming from Adobe After Effects. Video levels could be full range 0-255 in each channel (or 16 bit equivalent) instead of the 601/video range of 16 -235.
May be some useful information at
http://www.dv.com/features/features_item.php?articleId=196601411 (might have to set up a free log-in)
and for super technical background
http://www.poynton.com/notes/colour_and_gamma/ColorFAQ.html

Categories
Distribution Random Thought

What makes Television, Television?

I’ve been thinking a lot about what exactly is television? It seems slightly odd to continue to define television by the very limiting factor it’s being liberated from: broadcast and cable gatekeepers.

We could define Television as something that we watch on the screen in the corner, and that’s probably as reasonable a definition as any, but a little shallow. The announcements of devices like Appletv, along with similar devices from Sling Media, Netgear and announced features for Microsoft’s Xbox 360, mean that, by this definition, every contribution to YouTube is Television? I don’t think so.

Getting Internet-delivered Television back on the familiar screen is certainly an important step toward Television 3.0 but the addition of user generated content reopens the question of what is Television. After thinking about it I’ve come to the conclusion that there are two factors that define Television other than by the distribution channel.

To my mind, Television is the business of creating entertainment or educational content on a regular schedule with attention to the craft skills of production.

Television is a business. Consumer generated media is a hobby. (A worthy, worthwhile hobby by all means.) People work in Television production because they like the work but it is just that: their work. Companies produce shows in the hope of making more income than they spent making the program. Networks and Cable channels pay producers for programs hoping to get more revenue from advertising than the program cost them. And so on.

The other part of the equation: the careful application of craft skills, is harder to pin down. Call it professionalism or craft skills, but there’s a certain something about well crafted Television (across a range of budgets for sure) that sets it apart from “consumer generated content”. Not to be complacent, there’s an increasing amount of that consumer generated content that’s demonstrating professional craft skills.

Categories
Distribution

Nearly a Year without Television

Well, last February when we moved from the West San Fernando Valley to Burbank, for a variety of reasons we decided to not get a cable or satellite TV service. Since we got cable for Internet there was no over-the-air antenna connected to our apartment either. (The cable is swapped from the Master Antenna for the complex to Charter to provide Internet.) I originally blogged about the experience shortly after we started. The announced release of Appletv is a reason to revisit the experiment to date.

Content has been coming from a variety of sources. Some, certainly, is purchased from Apple’s iTunes Store, but most is coming via a legally gray source: bittorrent, justified in my mind by the experimental nature of what I was trying to do. On the plus side, the quality is great and most shows I’ve wanted has been available. Most of the content is encoded with the DivX combination: MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile with MP3 audio in an AVI wrapper. This will not play on an iPod nor on an Appletv (to the best of my reading of the specs). To date Apple have only supported MPEG-4 Part 2 Simple Profile natively and officially that’s what’s supported on iPods and Appletv.

Another “plus” (for us, not the industry) is that we watch less TV. There’s no incentive to “just turn it on and kick back” because it’s a blank screen unless we’ve prepared content to watch. Missing from the bittorrent sites are any contemporary Food Network shows (Good Eats and Emeril were watched sporadically). Full seasons are available but mostly not until they’re published on DVD.

Overall, this isn’t something I’d recommend as a solution for anyone really. It’s not television, because television is easy and this is not easy. I have to find the torrent file, made somewhat easier by the availability of RSS feeds to monitor most of the shows we watch, download the torrent file and then wait for it to download. Shows like Comedy Central’s Daily Show and Colbert Report are usually available within 4 hours of air time on the East Coast (faster than they get to the iTunes Store btw) and are fairly quick to download (occasionally faster than real time, but usually an hour or two).

The shows have to be burnt to disc and played from a DivX/MPEG-4/DVD Player at the TV. All in all, quite clumsy. For the RSS fed stuff I could probably use the Democracy Player which combines RSS with bittorrent but I’d still have to burn to disc.

So nearly 11 months into the experiment, what I really want to do is pay for the content! Seriously, if the pricing was fair (more below) I’d much rather have the convenience of regular release and commercial download, not bittorrent. The trouble is, no-one currently offers what I want and that was the reason for going TV-service-less in the first place!

The sticking points are the lack of content availability (250 shows is narrow head, not even middle tail, let alone Long Tail) and pricing. Putting aside the first for the moment, as there’s nothing we can do about stubborn studios, pricing is a major sticking point.

Prior to the move, we spent $55 a month on a 100 channel Dish Network service, which includes 160 hours a week of Comedy Central, for which Comedy Central got about 60c per subscriber (as near as I can discover – correct me in the comments) but definitely less than $1 a subscriber.

And yet, using Apple’s Season Pass, just two shows – Daily Show and Colbert Report – will cost me $19.95 a month for (no offense) disposable television. We’re currently watching about 40 hours (TV hours) a month of programming. If all were purchased through the iTunes store it would be $59.75. Not much more than the Dish Network purchase, right?

Wrong. For Dish’s $55 a month I get access to (in theory) 640 TV hours a month, not 40. If we watched the average amount of 4.5 hours a day (130 hrs a month) that’s about $180 a month at the iTunes store for what we paid $55 to Dish. Something does not add up.

FWIW, I’d be happy to pay somewhere between 10c and 30c a show for the Daily Show and similar “disposable” (doesn’t bear a second watching) television and 50-75c for content that I’d watch more than once – produced drama and comedy.

The producers are cutting demand by pricing too high to be practical. Get the pricing in line, so my a la carte spend matches (or slightly exceeds, for convenience) my previous bill and I’d much rather pay money for a better service.

The one other place we’re getting content is from podcasts. VH1’s “Best Week Ever” is consistently, easily (and freely) delivered, as is Good Night Burbank, The Show with Ze Frank and some other favorites. But these “true” ISO MPEG-4 files are not supported on the DVD Player (just DivX’s proprietary format incorrectly labeled as MPEG-4) so we have to run cables when we want to watch these. For that alone I’d like the Appletv.

Categories
General

CNN article on HDTV making talent look fat!

This is the URL for the CNN article Does this HDTV make me look fat? mentioned during the BuZZ in Depth segment on the January 4th edition of Creative Planet’s Digital Production BuZZ.

Categories
General

What is it about “Innovation”

Microsoft constantly claims that any attempt to restrict (whatever it wants to do) will somehow “reduce innovation”. I’m hard pressed to remember any actual innovation that Microsoft have actually released. (The excellent Photosynthesis tech demo is indeed innovative but it’s not yet ready for market.)

Likewise I hear the big four record companies talking about “innovative ways to distribute digital media” when they mean Digital Rights Management destroying the features we already enjoy with their product – like being able to move it from device to device, computer to computer without having to remember to de-authorize one computer before starting on the next.)

Disney are “innovating” on MySpace by making a cosy little non-space that’s designed to please parents but has nothing going for it compared to the real Internet. If parents are worried about what their kids are doing on the Internet they should be parents and manage it, not rely on some walled garden that tries to isolate itself from the rest of the Internet: isolates itself from what makes the Internet actually useful.

So, I’ve come to the conclusion that “innovation” a really a code word for “we haven’t got a clue”. Another example is the Telecommunications companies who are “innovating” with IPTV by creating a poor copy (less choice, more lag time between channels, expensive infrastructure) of a cable system.

I’ve got news for them all: innovation means doing something new, different, unexpected, evolutionary, revolutionary. Triple-play telco bundling is not innovative. Doing a limited version of cable TV on IP protocols is imitation not innovation. What would be innovative is something that gave more choice, was easier to find programming you were interested in, wasn’t limited to a “broadcaster’s” schedule and wasn’t controlled by some channel or network gatekeeper.

That would be innovation. If it fails, better to fail at trying something new than the inevitable failure of poor quality imitation on an infrastructure totally unsuited for the purpose… I’m looking at you ATT Uverse and Verizon. High speed, high bandwidth symmetrical broadband is useful and will power the real innovation that’s coming in television delivery. But that’s not what the telcos are about.

They’re about imitation and convince themselves it’s innovation. How deluded do you have to be to work there?

Categories
Apple Pro Apps Interesting Technology

XML Article at kenstone.net

Ken Stone has released an article I wrote on XML in the Final Cut Studio. The article is What is XML and what does it mean for Final Cut Studio users?

Also, Steve Douglas reviewed my company’s Pro Apps Tips, also at KenStone.net in the Pro Apps Tips Review.

Just thought you’d like to know. Oh, and in 2007, I’ll be posting more regularly as I evolve some of the thoughts around a book I’m working on, tentatively titled “Television 3.0”.