The present and future of post production business and technology | Philip Hodgetts

Archive for June 13th, 2010

Will Tiered Pricing Lead to “ProxyNets” and Destroy The Universe? INstead of more revenue, no customers for Telcos?

A very interesting take on how increasing cost for data on mobile devices could ultimately lead to an almost complete drop in revenue to the Telcos because networking would be all peer-to-peer, what Shelly Palmer is calling ProxyNets.

You can think of this network as a self-assembling, self-healing, invitation-only social media sharing network on steroids. It won’t need the Internet or any phone network because it will simply connect to whatever device invites it to connect; hence the idea of a Proxy Network or ProxyNet. I really wanted to call it a “Subnet” because it’s a network that exists under the radar. But, subnet is a term of art in the network world and it has a very specific and very different definition.

Any way, the end of the world comes in the following form. People download the ProxyNet apps and they start to form personal networks that almost mirror their social media networks. This happens automatically. Want to think about it in a contemporary way, think about Foursquare or Twitter. If a ProxyNet app simply connected to your friends’ devices when you were in proximity to them, you would not need the Internet or a phone company data network. The WiFi radios in the devices would do it all.

If this were the case, it would be easy to imagine five hundred students in a Junior High School whose smart phones and laptops are all connected to each other, but not connected to the Internet. The students would decide to share everything 1) ’cause they could. 2) ’cause it’s free. You can’t get into the network unless you’re invited. You can’t shut down the network because it doesn’t really exist. You can’t get the identity of anyone on the network because they are hidden by proxy (in the true network sense).

Independent Filmmaker’s take on bittorrent release of his film Only doc filmmaker making money back, thanks to ‘breach’.

In the Filmmaker’s words:

I contacted the uploader of my film and asked she spread a message of support with the torrent, asking for donations if a viewer likes the film and explaining that was a self-financed endeavor. The result? I received many donations and emails of support from those who downloaded the film, but I furthermore believe that viewers spread the word of the film to their non-torrent-downloading friends and that DVD sales increased due to the leak. For me, the torrent leak was ultimately “free advertising”, and I am the only truly independent documentary filmmaker I know making his money back this year.

Only bad or mediocre films need fear unauthorized distribution? According to Sam Bozo.

June 2010
« May   Jul »